Qtile, Ricchan!!
For the love of god, I’m using qtile once again. It’s cool. Simple.
Here’s a little review. What makes me choose qtile over others tiling manager? Well, I don’t really know why I choose qtile either.. I just thought that qtile is alien to me since I don’t use it for a long time. For that matter, I thought it will be hit and go, install and use. No more timesink wm where I spent most of the time tinkering with it and try to configure how it looks. For the most part, it’s true. It comes with okay default look, so just use it and get shits done. Well..
Not long after that, I remembered the reason I use qtile for the first time is its TreeTab layout. So, I decided to look at its config and, maybe, try to tinker a bit. Just a bit. For TreeTab layout. But it’s been a long time, so I need to check some documentations. First thing to do, is to visit its website, Qtile, and read some documentations. Cool. So well written even for a computer illiterate like me. Not to mention qtile.org has awesome design and really sweet, also it’s easy on the eyes. Long story short, I end up tinkering with my qtile’s config and here is my qtile.
Actually, I use Gnome3 on daily basis. But since I got my memory broken and left me with just merely 2GB on 64bit machine, you know how terrible it is to run that memory-eater DE on my machine, I thought I have to switch to light environment. Usually, I would take xmonad, but not this time. Xmonad, Awesome, MonsterWM, and so on are timesink wm, for me. And I just installed a fresh Arch on this machine, so xmonad is a no no for me. Its haskell library is so goddamn huge and I hate that part of xmonad. How about any other wm? Let’s say, Awesome WM. I’m not a fan of its behavior. It’s just strange. dwm, MonsterWM, Spectrwm, FVWM, WMFS, and so on, they just, timesink wm. You just configure it once for all, they said.. I said, NO. I’m a migratory bird. I’m not satisfied with static environment. I need a change sometimes. And it’s just a pain in the ass to configure so it can behave like I need. So, Qtile, I choose you!
I’d love to post how to configure qtile, but maybe later. Instead, I will make a little comparation between many WM (especially tiling wm) that I’ve been used. It’s just my opinion, so the experience may varies from others perspective.
WM | Pro | Cons |
---|---|---|
Xmonad |
Very customizable, indeed. I love the way it behaves. Can use many third party apps. |
Fucking HUGE library Inconsistent as fuck in Arch repo Ermm.. MUST use many third party apps to works well. |
AwesomeWM |
Very wide range of costumization. Popular. Has a lot of useful widgets. |
I fucking hate it. Fucking Lua. Too much configuration but still behave unnaturally. |
Qtile |
Just werk, I think. Pretty much easy configuration. Has TreeTab Layout! |
Not very customizable, really.. Not in the official repo (but I don't really care). Unpopular as fuck. |
dwm derivatives (catwm, franken, ...) must-compile-kek |
Muh Freedom. You can make whatever you want (if you can). Hardcore Masochist. (+) |
Too much hassle. A pain in the ass. Hardcore Masochist. (-) |
And, that’s it. Before I go, let me dump my configuration here, in case I need it some other time.